![]() |
|
||
| Previous page | ||
The return of a starry cast to the DonmarThree Days of RainDonmar Warehouse, London WC2 BACK in March Three Days of Rain put in a brief appearance as part of the Donmar's American Imports season. It returns for a longer spell in the same poised production, stylishly directed by Robin Lefevre, and with the same splendid cast. Colin Firth, Elizabeth McGovern and David Morrissey play a couple of parts apiece, and out of the six at least two (from Firth and McGovern) had me throwing my critical umbrella to the wind. As for the
other four: well, they lose out to different degrees in the grand scheme
of Richard Greenberg's likeable but sometimes surface-deep script. The
first half is set in 1995; the second ewinds to 1960. In the first, brother
and sister Walker and Nan (Firth and McGovern) reunite with
Walker is a neurotic dropout who lays his failings firmly at his parents' feet. Pip, whom Walker resents for being closer to his father than himself, is happy with his lot as a second-rate soap actor. Nan - well Nan is little more than a buffer between the other two. Fair enough and all perfectly well played, but all really an excuse for Walker to chance upon his father's journal. "Three days of rain" is the first entry: its inscrutability incenses him. "When people never talk to you, you always suppose they are harbouring some enormous secret - but maybe they have nothing to say," he digs away. Or maybe they do, but in a different way. In the second half the trio play their characters' respective parents. Here Firth and Morrissey are struggling architects Ned and Theo. Theo is theoretically the flamboyant genius, Ned the practical dogsbody, though again appearances fall short of the truth. McGovern plays a flirtatious, hard-drinking, self-aware Southern girl who has an affair with one and then, during that three-day downpour, the other. Greenberg,
I imagine, wants to show how easily the old folk, trying to make the best
of their own limitations, can be misunderstood by their children, convinced
of their own larger emotional life. Fittingly then, the second half is
much more vivid than the first; this is where Firth and, especially,
|
||
| Previous page |